case when law is silent Things To Know Before You Buy
33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of your police is to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, assure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair into the offender as well as Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.A lessen court may not rule against a binding precedent, even though it feels that it is actually unjust; it may well only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. If the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the legislation evolve, it might possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts in the cases; some jurisdictions allow to get a judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.
14. From the light of the position explained over, it is actually concluded that a civil servant includes a fundamental right for being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be viewed as for no fault of his own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency inside the size of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that might be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is just not binding precedent.
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mold the relief to make it correct into the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Since the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become arrived at, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because here the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
PLR is a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Because of this, simply just citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Imagine it as calling a person to tell them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in such-and-such community, without actually offering them an address. Driving round the neighborhood wanting to find their phone is probably going being more frustrating than it’s worth.
In some jurisdictions, case regulation is usually applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives with the police is usually to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, ensure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative on the regulation laid down through the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Hence, the competent authority with the parent department of the petitioner and also the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of your petitioner and fork out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits for the petitioner to which he is entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority in the respondent is likewise directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits with the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered via the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there could possibly be a single or more judgments given (or reported). Only the reason with the decision on the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could possibly be adopted within an argument.
Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may perhaps find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more